Miss Julie/a Dolls House

2) Miss Julie/ A Dolls dramaturgy DFK 120 Erene Oberholzer 11045231 Dr. M. Taub 4 kinfolk 2012 In this essay two plays, Miss Julie written by elevated Strindberg, and A Dolls home plate written by Hendrik Ibsen will be comp atomic number 18d and concerns such as gender, identity and mark will be contextualized. The section Ive chosen to portray echtism and other elements concerning these two plays resourced to the rifle rascals of both scripts. As I see the last pages construct the difference between the plays and characters. Both these plays pronounce a strand of realism, as in the Traditional Western canon.Third world text can be characterized by their degree of immediacy, topicality, mimetic quality, and even amicable realism (Gugelburger, G. M1991). world The term Realism introduces a strand of thought and considers the world as not reality but, mere appearance. We have no access to reality other than through representations. Yet, all representations only show us parti cular perspectives on reality. When people use the term realistic to describe a put down they are saying the film shows them an image of reality that they have come to know.Realism is a constructive construct, produced by reconcilable codes and conventions which change oer snip. Realism has been constructed to point turn out existing social reality. Naturalism, on the other hand, conveys a representation that looks sounds and feels similar the actual world outside the work of art. Naturalism looks sounds and feels like the things we would expect (Bob Nowlan sn sp). Where Ibsen trends to a greater extent to the line of realism, Strindberg informs pragmatism in his writings. For Strindberg good naturalism looked for natural conflicts. For him admittedly naturalism meant truth to nature.He was determined to have his plays subscribe to with fundamental truths. Miss Julie contains traces of symbolism, which were born out of the foundation of naturalism. Although many believe that due to the use of typic affects in Miss Julie, the play drifts away from the naturalistic, and more to the realistic. Strindberg employ all the elements needed for the development of the mend and the transference of superiority from Julie to Jean. Naturalism does not help for the development of the plot, whereas realism is a structure that reveals real life events and is focused on the people pictured, as shown in Miss Julie.Strindberg precious to create prominent illusion. His audience was to be completely convinced of the reality of the world off stage, and then transported into a scope of influence. Ibsens contribution to realism began when he consciously started to dramatize the forces and frictions of modern life. Ibsen indicates in A Dolls stomach that he was creating a particular life through Nora. Ibsens dialogue of A Dolls House comes of course he wanted the spectator to sit down, listen and look at events that happens in real life.Ibsen wrote generally about hidden relationships, social conversion and secret fears and anxieties Strindbergs play was actually written as a response to Ibsens A Doll fireside. Ibsen wrote his plays advocating women, and Strindberg had a contrary view. Hendrik Ibsens attitude toward orderliness is evident in his double vision of a secure social position. On the one hand, its a defense against attack, on the other such concerns lead to hypocrisies and superficial values. His play reveals him as utmost more than a realist (Taylor, J. 972 sp). Comparing My examples of both plays illustrate the elements of gender, identity and family. Both playwrights scripts set the last page out to set everything about the differences of these elements. By the ending we can see the fall (Strindberg) and rising of the charwoman (Ibsen) in social society that conviction. Gender, class&identity in A Dolls House Hendrik Ibsen was known as the father of modern drama as he helped popularize realism. He became an observer of the real piece life and informed realism in drama.In 1877 Norways social structure influenced Ibsens writings. He wanted to extol freedom and truth in his people. A Dolls House questions the suppressed role of women in that times society and also introduced the woman as having their own goals and own purposes. Torvald reveals many times his impairment viewpoint on gender roles. He believes his wives duty is to be at home and embarks on her to everlastingly appear beautiful. The central conflict in this playwright revolves around Trovalds gibeling treatment of his wife.The tragedy of this base is not only about a man controlling his wife, but also the dehumanizing of the children (Mahal 2012476). They are never given a chance to improving their position in the society. Nora, in the beginning of the play, seems to be happy and content whereas she acts out child like qualities. When Torvald walks in Noras childlike qualities becomes more transparent. His true character is later revealed wh en he accuses Nora of forgery and when he tries to disown her. His attitude changes when everything is sorted out, but she walks out of the marriage.Nora is depicted until the end of the play as a helpless, mindless fool (Mahal 2012 476). In the end of this story this degrading treatment of Nora by her husband is resolved. This play stresses upon the status of women and how their roles were perceived, as mothers and wives. Nora feels like shes been used as doll for her father and her husband, with no depth in their relationships. Nora exits her dolls house with a door slam, emphatically resolving the play with an act of bold self-assertion. A Dolls house appears to mislead the audience of the characters true colors.Our first impression of Nora is that she is childlike and Torvald is seen as strong. The plays terminate leads to the expose of resolving identity confusion. Nora becomes to be a brave woman and Torvald a sad man. Gender, class&identity in Miss Julie Strindberg was a Swe dish playwright and drew his writings from personal experiences. He failed at three marriages. Circumstances made him a naturalistic writer. He was known as a misogynist and a women hater. In Miss Julie (1879) he expresses his hatred for the opposite sex.He was forced to write a second ending for the play after much contr all oversy. The play was censored all over atomic number 63 as the play was socially offensive to women. The daughter of a count has an affair with a valet, who in turn forces her to commit suicide. Strindberg had an eye for injustice, but only dealt with the problem of womens rights as a view of realism in his plays. Julie suffers an identity crisis and displays her regard for class and gender conventions. She mingles with the servant when a party is thrown.She expresses stiff behavior but on other times she is coy. Jean warns her of her behavior as she was seen as a temptress. She wavers between the high and low class identity, and is in the end confused with h er own identity. Julie also identifies herself with both female and male figures. She confesses she has no self she can call her own. The characters in Miss Julie are portrayed through gender, class and ideology. In the end she orders Jean to hypnotize her to commit suicide. The play reveals Julie having no control over her sexual instincts.Once Julie and Jean seduced each other, their lives are changed (Ramandeep Mahal 2012 sp) mentions that the aristocrat in the social sphere becomes the slave of the valet and the valet becomes the aristocrat in the sexual sphere as Julie lowers herself beyond redemption. Julie is seen as an example of the naturalistic movement. The characters are seen as helpless products of hereditary and environment who interact with their minds and bodies, as they would in real life (Mahal 2012 sp). Both playwrights by Ibsen and Strindberg came of shocking the audience of their time, with the way they portrayed their women characters.Theyre depicting of sex and divorce was set off to much controversy (Mahal 2012475). A Dolls House is considered to be more libber work, where Strindberg has been seen as his arch enemy on that point. Ibsen has been seen to deny writing in a feminist point of view he has said many times that he wrote for the everyday man. Strindberg tended to emancipate woman. For example when Julie grows conscious about her humiliation she falls to Jeans knees. Jean triumphantly stands over her. This also symbolizes the hierarchy of the 1800s.These ideas govern the central world of the everyday in the aspect that they inform social hierarchies and show out elements of real happenings people experience everyday. Women were demanded by men, and men were befallen to the beauty of women. In that time of social structure woman belonged in the kitchen (As Strindbergs points out in Miss Julie) and they were there to go on the kids and beautify their homes. That was the real world. Some of these conventions still stand today in aspect of class and gender. Resources Ibsen, H. A. A Dolls House. Gugelburger, G.M. 1991. Germainistik, the Canon, and Third world literature. Mahal, R. 2012. A comparative study of Portrayal of women in Ibsens A Dolls House and Strindbergs Miss Julie. Available. o. Accessed 2 September 2012 www. rspublication,com Lukas, Nowlan, B. An introduction to the problematics of Realism in video, film, and moving image- culture. Available. o. Accessed 2 September 2012 www. uwec. edu/ranowlan/realism film_video_moving-imag_culture. html. Taylor, J. C. 1972. Ritual, realism, and revolt Major traditions in the drama. New York Schribner.